Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Jessica and I found a place!
With little luck in finding any places for less than $1600 a month (mind you some studios were going for about $1500 with only one parking spot!) we turned east and starting looking at more affordable places in east village, but no luck. Anything that was in our price range lasted for moments on the market and were very hard to find. Facing a choice between a 400 sq foot shoebox of an apartment, or giving up and looking elsewhere in San Diego, like Hillcrest or...well...I get depressed even thinking about it. We had our hearts set on Little Italy, and we desperately wanted a place there. It is, without a doubt, the most energetic, least trendy, least expensive, best culture, best food, best beer fests, greatest art walks, best parks, best views part of the city, the list goes on.
Enter craigslist.
I got pretty emotionally spent looking at all of those places and coming to a sad realization that our aspirations may have been a little too high, when in a stoke of luck, I saw a posting on craigslist. $1350 for a 1 bedroom in Little Italy. This wasn't something new, a few postings like this had shown up in the time we were looking, but either they were some weird situation involving odd lease agreements, a scam, or they were taken in seconds after they were posted.
Anyhow, Jessica showed a lot of interest in the place so I called up the landlord. Apparently 5 other couples were chomping at the bit and had already contacted her. I set up an appointment to view the place, but it really sounded as though this lady was very busy, and was not concerned with showing this to too many people, as it was assured to go quick. She gave us the last time slot she had open that day, we were 3 hours later than the first couple, and 5th to be shown the place. I actually met Jessica downtown for some brunch an hour before our meeting with the landlord and unknowingly passed by the landlord walking a couple around the property; later reaffirming to me that she wasn't scamming us, and that there were actually other people trying to get this place, and you can't blame them.
Here's the building it's in:
Better yet, this is a condo complex, so it's very clean and quiet. As opposed to the unmentionable conditions of most of the apartments we were considering. It's nuts, some of the places we were considering were FAR worse than my freshman dorms.
So we met the landlord and walked to the unit.
We walked into this:
A remarkably cool, small 1 bedroom unit with odd dimensions, cool wall angles, a large bathroom, a full washer and dryer and porch that can actually fit a weber grill so I can finally COOK!mmmmm weber grill....
The unit overlooks the "piazza" courtyard which has a really nice Water fountain that fills the place with the gentle sounds of a trickling stream in the crisp valleys of the Italian alps....good thing we have a big bathroom, I have to pee just thinking of it.
Needless to say we loved it the second we walked in. Other than Jessica's concerns that my California King Pillow Top mattress may be too large for the bedroom, the place is perfect (and i will make that bed fit, so help me if I have to tear down an exterior wall that bed will fit).
We told the landlord we really wanted the place but we had to talk about it first. Understanding if we didn't act fast this place would go in a second, we got in all our paper work, ran our credit, kissed some major landlord butt, and impressed her enough to choose us over the other applicants. Jessica is dropping off the deposit today, and we'll both be signing the lease when I get back from Yosemite.
So that's it! We found it. And will be calling Little Italy home in about 2 weeks. So when you come to visit here's some of the amazing things within walking distance of our pad:
I don't know what this is, but that lady looks like shes having fun. And that little kid has a really cool flag...
Little Italy has some of the best Deli's and restaurants in the entire city.
This is Basilione Plaza, home to concerts and art walks
I don't know, but tents generally mean food and beer, and lots of people can't be wrong.
This is the Princess Pub and Grill which looks like an awesome "Brr-ish" Pub with some sweet dart boards, great beers, and I'm sure a soon to be second home for me and anyone else visiting. Jessica may grow to hate this place, as well as my liver, beer belly, and dart throwing arm.
And finally, the trolley stop is 3 blocks from our pad. Giving us cheap access to Fashion Valley, the Chargers, Old Town, Del Mar, Solana Beach, Oceanside, LA and the rest of the rail connected world.
We should move in in the beginning of October, and I'll be sure to post some photos of the place.
-David
Thursday, September 20, 2007
HOW TO: Create a slideshow for your website
I have a simple solution that can make this possible, and better yet it's FREE! and simple!
See a sample of the final result here: davidhgatley.com
First off, it should be known I have nothing to do with the following sites. They just happen to be the best products I have ever used, and I wish to share them with you. In return for their use they ask that you create and account with them, which I recommend doing.
(If you have a Myspace account, much of these STEPS 1-7 should be rather simple.)
STEP 1.) go to www.slide.com.
STEP 2.) set up a free account on that site. I don't receive any spam from slide.com, so feel free to use your normal email if required.
**Note, you do not have to create an account, however if you want to save your slideshow and or make any changes, you need an account to do so.
STEP 3.) Find the "Make a Slideshow" button and click.
STEP 4.) At this point you'll be able to create your slide show.
*To customize the effects play around with the "customize your design" section
STEP 5.) Upload your photos
STEP 6.) Click "Save and Get Code"
STEP 7.) Copy the code slide.com creates for you
Now that you have your code you need to paste it with the BODY of your website. Now this is where a basic level of HTML coding will come into play. Assuming you can access your desired web page editor, make changes, and save it; this will all be easy. If you do not know how to do this, contact me for further help at davidhgatley.com.
STEP 8.) Paste the code in the body of your website
Step 9.) Fit it to size (remember to scale the slide show proportionally. The default size that slide.com issues is a height of 320pixels and a width of 436pixels.
Your code should look something like this: (do not copy this code it, will not work)
**find the width and height within the code:
p style="visibility:visible;" object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://widget-ac.slide.com/widgets/slideticker.swf" height="320" width="426" style="width:426px;height:320px" param name="movie" value="http://widget-ac.slide.com/widgets/slideticker.swf" / param name="quality" value="high" / param name="scale" value="noscale" / param name="salign" value="l" / param name="wmode" value="transparent"/ param name="flashvars" value="cy=ms&il=1&channel=43234556424tt30218284&site=widget-ac.slide.com"/ /object> p a href="http://www.slide.com/pivot?cy=ms&ad=0&id=432345564240218284&map=1" target="_blank" img src="http://widget-ac.slide.com/p1/432345tt5643240218284/ms_t016_v000_a000_f00/images/xslide1.gif" border="0" ismap="ismap" /> href="http://www.slide.com/pivot?cy=ms&ad=0&id=4323453564240218284&map=2" target="_blank" img src="http://widget-ac.s1ide.c0m/p2/43234tt5564240218284/ms_t016_v000_a000_f00/images/xslide2.gif" border="0" ismap="ismap" /
Make sure to change both fields to your desired size.
And you should be good to go!
Hope that helps,
-David
Monday, September 17, 2007
New Orleans- Jazzfest 07 - The Plight - The Flood - The coolest city in America
Last May (2007) I embarked on a journey that would eventually become one of the greatest experiences of my adult life. Devin (my best friend from high school) invited myself and 7 other buddies to all meet up in New Orleans for the city's annual Jazz Festival. It should be noted that Devin's father, John Quirk, is the New Orleans Historic National Jazz District Superintendent; meaning we were all going to roll VIP status, or at least be able to act like it. John and Priscilla (Devin's parents) were kind enough to let us crash at their pad.
John (pictured above) opening the door to his beautiful house, and welcoming the horde of men about to take over the city inside. This trip took place almost exactly 2 years after Katrina. You wouldn't know it however because much of the devastation was still evident throughout the city. Worse yet, the city has yet to rebuild it's defenses against another storm that size. I'll get to this a little later, in the mean time, see the Lyons-Quirk pad below, our home for the following 4 days.
Built in, i'm guess the 1800's, this house is a testament to how classy and cool a house can be. Not only did it survive Katrina, but it's still standing after a fire gutted it's interior. All the floors of the house were covered with rich, red wood planks, the ceilings were lined with amazingly detailed crown molding, and the everywhere you went you were reminded of the sophistication and character that was used to build homes hundreds of years ago. Nothing like the cookie cutter houses I'm used to in So-Cal. It's crazy to think that New Orleans and much of Louisiana were founded by pirates long before America was a country. The French cultural influence and outlaw, pirate life still has a firm grasp on everything in the area.
After unpacking our bags, settling in, and awaiting everyone's arrival from the airport, we headed out to a couple of the neighborhood bars. It must have been around 6 pm when Devin, Mikey, Biz, Scott, and myself headed outside for our first taste of "Nawlens". We headed, what I'm guessing was North, towards a small bar/pub that served some authentic cajun food and some awesome local beer. We all reeked of the gallons of bug spray Devin's mother doused us with. Good thing too, the humidity made walking more like swimming, and must have tripled the already massive amounts of bugs. As we walked down the street, some of the gravity of the city started to set in. These homes had been here for so long. All the trees had overgrown much of the side walks, making tunnels of leaves and mossy ferns.
Night was falling and the city seemed to be waking up. Lights were flicking on and people were slowly emerging out of their houses. We made it to the bar at about 6:30. From the outside looking in, the bar easily passed as a house, minus the flickering neon lights. Although, it appeared as though the owners lived upstairs from the bar, so perhaps it really was more house than bar.
We all stumbled inside, trying to escape the parade of mosquitoes following us from Devin's front door. We must have stunk like tourists; for the entire bar all the muttered conversations, the dish washing, even the music playing in the background stopped when we came in. Everyone looked at us for a minute, looked us over from head to toe, paused for an awkward couple of seconds, then resumed in their discussions of who knows what... probably the best way to broil a craw dad, the best grease for deep frying a squirrel, or some other salty topic. That seemed to be a consistent vibe I encountered throughout the city; the semi-annoyance of tourists accompanied by the ultimate acceptance of our tourism dollars. It was as though everyone sensed we would only be there a short time. Not to get all wax-philosophic on a city, but I think if a city can have a soul, New Orleans would be one of the traveler, passing but for just a moment through the city's immense history. Anyhow, I ate some crazy cajun dish that made me think people over use the word cajun when describing menu items. I washed it all down with a rather tastey brew, Abita Beer, which I highly recommend.
(image courtesy of: http://www.abita.com/images/wallpapers/amber02.jpg)
We paid our bill and headed back to Devin's pad. We walked back on one of the levees. I later found out that the same levee we were walking on was the same that had broken down the river, flooding much of the city, and well you know the rest of that story.
The next day Russ and Moudy, and Darin showed up. After a groggy start to the morning, we were all ready to tour the Bayou swamp land. Being that there were 8 of us, 2 cars were in order. Perhaps Devin's parents' largest mistake of the trip was allowing us to borrow these ill-fated vehicles. We headed out, driving through some of the coolest neighborhoods in America (and by coolest I mean most dilapidated, poverty stricken, crime ridden, ghettos) but at least the trees were pretty.
We were headed for Jean Laffite National Historic Park (the bayou swamp land). Our destination was promised to be filled with gators, snapping turtles, voodoo witches, and crazy forgotten souls who practiced cannibalism when they were bored. Little did we know something much more dangerous was in store for our poor, unfortunate souls.
When we arrived, in a clever disguise of the dangers of nature, a sweet little vine-rope swing welcomed us to the swamp.
Like a bunch of 8 year old, tarzan wannabe's we swung to and fro for about ten minutes. Happy and content we pressed on. After I finish this story you may never want to travel here, so in hopes of you stopping now, you should know, this park was absolutely beautiful. Unlike anyplace I have ever seen, the swamp truly is a mystical place that must been experienced.
The wooden walk ways seemed to float inches above the gator infested swamp. Weaving in and out of swamp trees and grassy plains, this brief mile hike had more diversity per foot than imaginable. The sounds surrounded us, the rustling of the reeds in the wind, the eery animal calls, the frogs, the drops of water, the trickling streams. It seemed so peaceful and enormous.
That was however, a short lived feeling.
To the southwest of us, a massive storm was rapidly developing, we could hear the tremendous booms of thunder and occasionally saw lightning flickering in the distance. Devin was the first to voice some concern saying something to the effect of "hey guys, so that storm looks like it's moving in, theres about a half mile left of this trail...you think we should keep going or turn back now?" We all paused for a moment to re-evaluate our situation. No one really said anything, so like a fool I uttered my famous last words, (i was thinking to myself, ohh just a half mile, thats no time at all, and who cares, we're already soaking in sweat from this damn humidity a little rain may be nice) "Ehh, the wind seems to be blowing that storm in the opposite direction of us, I doubt well see any of it" It must have been my cheap attempt at a meteorological forecast, but everyone bought it. I'm sure we all knew, in some way or another, that pressing on would get us a little wet, but no one, even Devin, could have predicted to what degree.
For the next ten minutes or so, it seemed I may have been right. The storm wasn't headed our way and just a little rain was falling...that was until the wind changed direction and started blowing with about hurricane force strength.
This was the last photo I managed to take before the sea's opened up above us. At about the same time we reached the further most point of the trail, the storm unloaded it's fury on us. I'm not talking about your typical rainy downpour here, it was seriously as if somebody dropped the pacific ocean on top of us. We started heading back, laughing at the ridiculousness of the situation. But, with each passing minute, the storm picked up, rained even harder, and the lightning was getting even closer, our laughing quickly turned from quiet concern to silent panic, and eventually led to an all our sprint back to the cars. Running/swimming for our lives we tore back down the same, once peaceful, trail that we entered on. The swamp was swelling with the downpour and slowly taking over our boardwalk. I just imagined that gator's thoughts while they ate our bug spray tasting bodies "freaking morons...the storm looks like its going the other way...wow...you guys went to Harvard?!" Stupid gator, that encouraged me to run harder.
It should also be noted at this point that 90% of this group of guys were Ivy League cross country runners. I can't speak for everyone else, but Devin is pretty much retardedly fast at long distance running, not special olympics retarded but Prefontane retarded. So as my gator induced, adrenaline sprint peeked at what I thought was blazing fast, 5 of the 8 were disappearing in the distance. Just Darin, Scott and I remained. For the next 2 to 3 minutes not one of the 3 of us said a word. We didn't want to come to terms with Darwin's survival of the fittest theory, we just wanted to make it to our cars before the swamp swallowed us alive. Right before all hope was lost, the car's emerged from the drenched tree line.
Stripping down to our shorts (I guess thinking we would minimize the amount of water allowed into the inside of the vehicles) we piled inside the cars. We all caught our breath, made sure we were all in one piece and started laughing hysterically thinking the worst was over. Everyone calmed down, somewhat sad our adventure was over, and we left the parking lot and headed back towards civilization. The road out of the park was pretty treacherous, the windshield wipers could barely keep up with the onslaught of rain, and the puddles were deepening by the second. And just as we thought we had made it through the danger zone, nature once again reminded us that we were in New Orleans, a city below the water line.
Darin, driving the family mustang was behind us, in the family truck. I remember looking back at that silver mustang filled with 4 half naked, fully grown men, thinking I would never see them again, as the water came seeping out from underneath the hood.
Streets were turning into rivers, and there seemed to be no where to go. Eventually Darin sailed the mustang into a parking lot thinking we could ride the storm out, and the water would eventually recede.
"Pull over! we lost darin!" I yelled to Devin. It was at that moment I realized everyone, every soul, had given me their cell phones for protection. I had the only backpack of the group, and it happened to be a champion of backpacks, swiss army's waterproof hiking back pack with an iPod pocket=) Crappy part being, there was now no way to get a hold of anyone in Darin's car. We were miles away from home, and no one knew how to get back.
So we pulled into a parking lot a couple blocks down the street. I decided I would make a run for it to Darin's car with a cell phone. Devin, Scott, and Mikey wished me luck, told me they loved me, and watched as I ran for Darin. The sidewalk was waist deep in water and the current was incredible, it was like the worst rip tide I have ever seen. I made for higher ground and started running on the front yards of the businesses on the way to Darin. I looked down from time to time as I sunk my feet into the depths of the abyss below me and saw bodies, small boats, live electrical wires and piranhas. Just as the stupidity of my plan was setting in, as well as the water setting into to Darin's phone rendering it ultimately useless, I saw Darin's boat of a mustang sail past me on the road back towards Devin. I remember locking eyes with Moudy in the front seat. As if we were brothers, being separated for the rest of our lives we watched as the car floated past. Moudy had one hand on the window, watching me with a solemn look of despair. Helpless, he must have thought I was going to die.
5 minutes later, we were reunited. I handed Darin his secretly destroyed cell phone, wished their boat luck, and got back in with Devin and the crew. We sailed on. The city as a whole suffered just as badly. It was later found out that the massive pumps used to pump water out of the city and back into lake Pontchartrian failed, and like Katrina, the city was filling with water. You could see the break down in systems designed to help people, emergency crews were left stranded, police couldn't block flooded roads, people were getting their cars stuck it was catastrophic failure everywhere. This was one single storm, not even close to a hurricane, and the city was in ruin again. Our little adventure culminated with an "off roading" adventure through backyards and medians. The city streets were shut down, and no one, anywhere was moving.
We made it back to Devin's house. Darin rejoiced by kissing the ground. Everyone else, stricken with the near death experience quietly filed inside and recovered. Retelling the story to John and Priscilla with 8 different versions proved one exciting story. We all washed up, rinsed off, hung our clothes out to dry and decided to go look at the city, after the storm passed through.
As if running from the death swamp wasn't enough, the track stars decided a jog was in order. (See photo at the beginning of the blog). I decided to ride Priscilla's bike and Darin decided to run Murphy, the dog. Scott was hidden in the house, assuming the fetal position and sucking his thumb in horror. While running (riding my ladies bike) along the levee some incredible views of the city could be seen. We even ran past a shipyard rebuilding some of the barges that deliver goods up and down the Mississippi.
I found this photo rather telling of the rebuilding effort. Here we were hours after devastation, and still work pressed on. I found it as a testament to the resilience of the entire town. New Orleans may be broken, but it has been here for hundreds of years, and as far as I can tell, it's not about to go anywhere.
The next day brought about the purpose of the trip; our attendance to Jazz Fest. Thankfully Priscilla bought us Saturday tickets as opposed to Friday tickets, seeing as how Friday's festival was all but ruined when the fairgrounds were turned into a small lake. We strolled down downtown on our way to the shuttles to the festival grounds. The city really is a beautiful urban area. Eclectic bars and mainstream upscale hotels are randomly found on every block. Every street was filled with character and charm, we definitely spent far too little time here.
We did happen to make an appearance at Burbon street this same night. However for the sake of all of the involved parties, I will leave out those details in fear of imprisonment and or loss of professional status.
Jazz fest however, was outrageous. While you ponder the next portion of the blog, perhaps you should be listening to this:
sweet zydeco music
Some 500,000 people joined us that Saturday in what had to be 100 degree weather. There were something like 5 stages with all kinds of jazzy music. Picture a state fair, with no animals, good food, great music, and a lot of people smoking weed.
We spent the entire day revolving between stages, and styles of music. By the end of the day I passed out on the lawn with John Mayer rocking in the background.
We returned home to a treat. John had made us a traditional Shrimp broil. He sacrificed the dinning room table to the shrimp gods, and let our animal instincts take over. After consuming about 60 shrimp a piece and drowning them with some more tastey Abita beer, we journeyed to Bourbon street and concluded our adventures (note I'm leaving out bourbon st. adventures for aforementioned reasons)
All in all, this was an incredible trip. Worthy of retelling many times over. I made some incredible friends and cannot wait to do it, or something similar, again.
Thanks again to John And Priscilla for hosting. I left so much out, but you should get the point. This city was just incredible. Perhaps my fondest memories were those I can never retell. The amount of energy felt in the smallest of local bars. The lively atmosphere, the kindness of strangers (at times), the presence of history, the lawless nights, they all added up to an overall feeling of home, despite being a visitor. This city has left a mark on my soul, and I hope to return soon.
-David
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
How to buy your first Digital SLR camera
Summing it up
First off, you need to figure out what you are going to be taking pictures of. I like to break DSLR consumers into 3 categories. If all of the below fit, you are wise beyond your years. =)
1.) The Sporty Parent: Little Timmy and Sally are weekend warriors, and your life revolves around getting 300 pictures of their game winning goal, their home run swing, or just capturing the kids playing in the pool. You want photos of activities. You are generally on the sidelines observing and cheering on the situation. You want to show off your kids / friends in sports illustrated style action shots. Uses: Sports, Action, Telephoto lenses, shooting from greater distances.
2) The Quarter Life Artistic Crisis: On your road trip away from the daily grind, you find solace in the open road. The expansive skies. You find emotion in a sunset, or a dew encrusted flower. You love hiking, hugging trees, vibrant colors, and you want to capture these natural wonders with a camera capable of doing so. Uses: Landscapes, nature, sunsets, low light situations, tri-pods, wide angle lenses.
3) The Budding Wedding Photographer: You like people. You want to make people look good in your photos. You're tired of eyes half closed from blinking, washed out faces, red eyes, and tiny subjects. You aren't afraid to get close up and shove your camera into any moment. Uses: Portraits, Weddings, Parties, Indoor, People, Products, Tight shots with Flashes.
Of the three there are well suited options, which I will get to below. Of all three there are great versatile camera set ups that will allow for shooting in any situation.
Pricing It Out:
How much do you want to spend on this? DSLR camera bodies (without the lenses) range from $400 dollars to $2000. Lenses range from $200 to $10,000.
First, ask yourself if there is any way to make money from your shots. Are the hordes of soccer mom's willing to shell out some dough for their kids captured at their greatest. Are you thinking of doing some photo gigs on the side with your friends? If you camera, can in any way return some investment, spend as much as possible.
If you are doing this for personal endeavors, you want every dollar to count. This camera will last you for a while if you buy it right, and you should buy just the right product. Too little camera won't allow for any growth in the subject area, and too much camera might be wasted in areas you never utilize.
A incredibly good base model DSLR is the Nikon D40 (photo left). (about $600 w/ lens)
and or the Canon equivalent the 350D Digital Rebel (about $650 w/ lens)
See dpreview's review of the D40 here and the Canon Digital Rebel here. These cameras would be great for somebody who doesn't expect to grow much in the hobby, and wants a little more control over the photos than a typical point and shoot camera will provide. You will still find some shutter lag (time between clicking the shutter button and when the camera actually takes the picture) And you will find a limited selection of lenses for these models. Keep in mind for less the $200 more, you can get a substantially better camera.
A mid-ranged pro-sumer (not quite a pro, better than average consumer) model would be the Nikon D80 (about $900 w/ lens) and the Canon Digital Rebel Xti(about $800 w/ lens).
See the Nikon D80 dp review and theCanon Digital Rebel Xti review. Both of these cameras are great. Leaps and bounds better than the entry level models mentioned above. These two will give you everything you could ever need in a camera on a non-professional level. Although, even some professionals have been known to use these cameras. The lenses compatibility with these are far greater than the lower models, and even some of your old film SLR camera's lenses will work with either of these.
In case $900 is too much for this camera. See the Nikon D70. The model the D80 replaced. The price has plummeted on this model, and it is still, by all means, an incredible camera. One I have worked with for well over 2 years. For maybe about $700, you can score one of the D70s. See the D70 review.
There are higher model cameras available, the Nikon D1x and D2x, but well...if you're about to drop 2000 dollars on a new camera, you're one of two people who shouldn't be here. 1. A professional who is very bored. 2. Somebody with no experience, far too much money, and a learning curve ahead of them that would challenge even Ansel Adams.
Lenses:
The above prices and were quoted with the assumption that when you purchase the camera it will come with a standard DSLR lens. Generally something like a 18-70mm lens. What does that mean? 18-70mm is a fancy way of describing the effective depth of field your lens is capable of attaining.
18-77 mm lenses are good for landscape photography and subjects you can get up close to. If your subject is relatively still and within 10 feet, this is a great lens for all around shooting. This is the go to lens for most amature photographers. It is also good for relatively wide shots, of open landscapes or sunsets. Good for the quarter-life-artistic-crisis consumers. And the budding wedding photographer.
70-300mm lenses are good for sports photography that you can get within 100 ft of your subject. Say the sidelines of a little league game, or soccer. This won't get you close to pro sports athletes from the nosebleed seats, but if you're on the field with the players, this size lens will get you tight up shots of your subject. These can also work dramatically in portrait photography. Getting very tight on the face and blurring the background for a very professional look and feel.These lenses are great for the Sporty Parent and the budding wedding photographer.
300-700mm lenses are for subjects very far away. These are you standard telephoto lenses and can get extremely pricey.
The Megapixel Myth
No, more megapixels does not necessarily mean better photos. Basically what megapixels refer to is the amount of data that camera stores for each picture. Just because there is more of it doesn't make it better. A ton of poor data will still give you a poor picture. What really matters in digital cameras are the nitty gritty components of the camera that most people are unaware of. The digital processor for example, the light sensors, and the quality of the optics inside both the lens and the camera body all add up to the quality of the image. Megapixels are nothing more than "sponges" soaking up the information all those aforementioned parts put out.
So, it is possible for a 6 mp camera to take better photos than an 8 mp camera. Keep this in mind when looking at cameras. Megapixels is a catchy sales word that takes attention away from the more important pieces of the camera. David Pogue wrote a great article about this in lehman's terms at His article here
Accessories
Still with me? Bravo!
So, if you aren't overloaded enough by now, don't worry...it gets worse. Buying a DSLR requires a small amount of required accessories. The most important being the flash. If you want decent indoor pictures with no red eye, and dramatic lighting, this is the cheapest (relative term) and easiest way to do so. No I'm not talking about the built in flash, no DSLR on the market has a decent one. I am talk about this:
A giant, geeky, photographer must have, the speed light. If you buy nothing else make sure this is it. This model sells for something around $200 and is great.
Other accessories that are just as important:
The Tripod: Buy the heaviest, simplest tripod you can afford. The heavier the better, as light weight tripods tend to vibrate more to the camera and blur images. Try to look for tripods with quick release heads.
The Memory Card: The fastest card the best. I'm talking about the speed at which the card stores the image. You'll see this advertised on clearly on the front of the box. What this means is, if you are trying to snap rapid shots of someone running across a soccer field, if you card lags and takes a while to write the images, the camera will stop taking pictures and wait for it to catch up. Cameras will buffer this, and instead of being able to take 10 shots in 2 seconds, you might only get 6 or 7.
The Battery: Buy and extra battery and keep it charged. Nothing is worse than being in the middle of no where when your battery dies. Most of these cameras use rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, meaning you can't just pop in 8 AAA batteries and get back to work. You need to specific battery for your camera, and at least 2 of them. Especially if you're doing a lot of indoor flash photography.
Why Nikon? I chose to compare Nikon and Canon in this guide primarily because they are the industry leaders. My father, being a professional photographer (The LA Times, NY Times, Time Mag, etc.), only uses Nikon. Much of my life was paid for by that tool. So yes, I am somewhat biased. I own a couple Nikons myself. And while I've never used a canon, and don't have anything against them, I highly recommend Nikon. Nikon consistently produces better optics and sensors, and while canon seems to be turning this trend, Nikon will give you the best value for your dollar at the present time.
Obviously there's a lot to consider here. I barely glazed the surface. I hope it helps. If you have any further questions, please don't be afraid to contact me at www.davidhgatley.com.
-David
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Going back to Yosemite...
Until then, here's some of my favorites from the past:
This has to be one of the most photographed places I have ever been to. Making it one of the hardest places to capture from a different perspective, so my main focus of this next trip will be just that; seeing Yosemite through a different lens. Hopefully that lens won't be a result of copious amounts of pale ales, and stouts, and lagers....but even if it is, I think we all win.
Until then,
-David
Return to yosemite
Mass Media and the Loss of Individuality
The Industrial Revolution shifted economic and social change, making the world available to all who wanted to experience it. Efficiency and innovation led society into a new world, a world that needed to stay connected. Mass Media by definition is designed to distribute media to as many people as possible. In essence, Mass Media keeps the world connected. Understanding the process of how Mass Media works, primarily in regards to it relationship with society, one will see the grandeur of the spectacle that is Mass Media. All 1984 and Brave
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, needs were based on survival. People made, farmed, and bought only what they needed to provide for their families. Occupations existed to provide unique services and you were known for your job. For instance in
Society needed news. People wanted to be informed how the world was advancing and the beginning forms of print journalism exploited this hunger for information.
The newspaper of 1897 was the sole purveyor of news until the advent of newsreels in the 1910s (Hearst was a pioneer, by the way) and radio in the 1920s. Its comics, fiction, and features made it the home-entertainment center. Ample advertisements made it the shopping bazaar and wish book, too, both of which explain why so many homes consumed more than one daily each day. The competition for readers in New York was intensified, writes Campbell, by the decline of the previously dominant newspapers—Pulitzer's World, Charles A. Dana's New York Sun, James Gordon Bennett Jr.'s New York Herald, and Whitelaw Reid's New York Tribune. Even so, Pulitzer sensed enough of the crisis to order his business manager to recruit a spy within Hearst's Journal to find the source of the paper's ideas and identify what dissatisfied talent might be willing to leave Hearst and join him. – Shafer, Jack The Great Press War of 1897, Slate 2006
After the Industrial Revolution was in full gear, mass merchandising came into place and people soon discovered there were many things available to them to buy. With more things to spend money on people started situating themselves into jobs that would provide more money, while not necessarily providing personal satisfaction. More places to spend money lead to more companies competing to win money; less personal satisfaction lead people to try and fill the void with material possessions. The competition between corporations lead to mass commercialism. Commercialism then found its roots within media and the proliferation of new products was sent to the masses. People were reading about products that would make their lives better, help them keep up with the Jones’s. “For consumers as a whole, Boss sees a collective psychology prevailing. "We ask, 'What are others doing, and what can I get for myself?' Nobody wants to admit that there's anybody they're keeping up with, but we do collectively keep up with one another." – Gardner, Marylin A penny earned is a penny spent, The Christian Science Monitor 2006. With all of society consuming bigger and better products, innovation was at a peak. Soon two new technologies came into the spotlight that would forever change the way society gained information from Mass Media, radio and television.
In 1859 Oliver Wendell Holmes described photography as the most remarkable achievement of his time because it allowed human beings to separate an experience or a texture or an emotion or a likeness from a particular time and place — and still remain real, visible, and permanent. He described it as a "conquest over matter" and predicted it would alter the physics of perception, changing forever the way people would see and understand the world around them. Holmes precisely observed that the emergence of this new technology marked the beginning of a time when the "image would become more important than the object itself and would in fact make the object disposable." Contemporary advertising critic Stuart Ewen describes the photographic process as "skinning" the world of its visible images, then marketing those images inexpensively to the public. – Thoman, Elizabeth Rise of the Image Culture, Center for Media Literacy 2003 See: Elizabeth's article here: http://www.medialit.org
Radio became a mainstream technology and transformed once distant social activities into every household. Radio also introduced new forms of marketing and more vibrant sources for news and information. The spectacle was now starting to take shape and people began to distract themselves from reality every night through a hypnosis of sorts from this speaking box. The success of the radio fostered the birth of television, which rapidly transformed the world. The masses became enamored with television and the stars it created. TV shows become commonplace, and commercials become as important as the show content. Television starts shrinking the world introducing celebrity fame and furthering the loss of identity.
When I heard the mellifluous voice of Ronald Reagan announce on GE Theatre that "Progress is our most important product," little did I realize that the big box in our living room was not just entertaining me. At a deeper level, it was stimulating an "image" in my head of how the world should work: that anything new was better than something old; that science and technology were the greatest of all human achievements and that in the near future — and certainly by the time I grew up — the power of technology would make it possible for everyone to live and work in a world free of war, poverty, drudgery and ignorance. – Thoman, Elizabeth Rise of the Image Culture, Center for Media Literacy 2003
People became so interested in fame they began to wonder if anyone would ever recognize them as an individual. This furthered loss of individuality and started molding society to emulate importance modeling the lives of the people they see on TV and read about in beauty and tabloid magazines. Commercials interlaced with biased news networks sponsored by media conglomerations started broadcasting stereotypical personalities; the people society wanted to become. Furthermore television moved from information based news shows to more entertainment based productions.
The rise in these types of magazines has everything to do with pent-up demand, said Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture and television at
In fact, we currently have shows composed of nothing but celebrity entertainment “news”. To reiterate “Entertainment News”, people have become so hypnotized by television that they can’t even distinguish the fact that the news they are watching is for their entertainment not to inform them of real problems they face. That same entertainment news is filled with celebrities talking about face creams or diet programs they themselves buy and or recommend. This substance free programming leaves the viewer with a thirty minute show about nothing of any real consequence. Laced within the thirty minutes are various commercials selling products that more or less add no real value to anyone’s life and are repeated ad nauseam. So in essence, our mainstream television has now become a box broadcasting nothing of any substance, selling valueless products and indoctrinating our “individual” opinions. People start to see beauty which is defined by these companies trying to sell products that will make people beautiful. People start to believe news that will effect how they vote and place people into office to make news and control their lives. People start to see these “beautiful” television and movie stars and do everything in their power to bring any bit of that fame into their own lives. “’There’s a real hunger for this,’ said Steven Cohn, editor-in-chief of Media Industry Newsletter, which tracks industry trends. ‘There’s not a hunger for newsmagazines. There’s not a hunger for business newsmagazines. But there is a hunger for celebrity newsmagazines’.” –Davies, Jennifer Gluttons For Gossip, The
The overwhelming tragedy of it all can be seen by what society has become today, an entertainment consuming, distracted, bland mixture of subtleties and indifference. Individuals are few and far between as the masses consume not just information, but free thinkers. People are so desperate to be unique that they look to other people for inspiration, the problem being that our media broadcasts and highlights the same models of individuality to the masses creating nothing more than a sea of clones constantly trying to keep up and follow the newest trend. Joe Smith the blacksmith is no longer the blacksmith, now he is the accountant, he is the taxi driver, he is the software engineer; Joe Smith is now one of three hundred other Smiths in the phone book, none of which actually blacksmith anything. How is Joe Smith any different than Bill Smith? What individual characteristics or value can he use to separate himself from anyone else? Who will notice that he is gone if and when he is gone? The loss of individuality is a terrifying proposition that most men lead lives of quiet desperation fighting.
Perhaps Thoreau was correct; people need self value and worth. Perhaps the spectacle resultant from the Industrial Revolution is not so much the distraction from real life, but the cheap ideal that we aren’t worth anything as an individual. The irony of the spectacle is in it inescapable appeal to the masses; for the spectacle is nothing more than a reflection of society at its best and worst, more often the latter. The understanding that the viewer is in a sense watching themselves seems to escape most, which is arguable the reason the spectacle is so amusing. We want to be distracted and entertained, Shakespeare perfected it, Hitler took advantage of it, and the media whores it out to any one willing to buy it. Our daily grind revolves around the spectacle, the idle water cooler conversation about last night’s police chase, the latest Fox prime time TV show. It’s as though the grim reality that our lives could be boring without spectacle, and that fear of status-quo drives the masses insane with commercialism and capitalistic endeavors to desperately try to become part of the spectacle.
-DavidDreaming of Blogging
It's just after noon on a Tuesday and I'm trying to escape the rest of the work day at my desk. Dreaming of a time when I'll have the time to grab my Macbook and battle the blogging grounds in style.
This post-it covered desk in the middle of white collar suburbia hell really negates a lot of the positive energy in my life. I suppose though, it could be argued, that its through those same frustrations all of this began. My desires of escapism peeked and sent me typing away through cyber-space trying to occupy my idle time. I really couldn't resent this place more. The ominous, life draining fluorescent ceiling tile sky above me; the padded psych-wardesque cubicle walls around me; the neutral colors, the bland smiles, the idle chat about American Idol, it all rips out my soul piece by piece, day by day.
If only this were some hip, urban cafe with a bunch of 20 somethings. Maybe some nice mellow jazzy tunes mixed with the soft murmur of private conversations. The fresh aromas of some fresh brews, the clank of dishes and silverware being washed in the back kitchen. I'd be tucked away in the corner absorbed by my new home. Outside the city lights would be on, but the autumn's night sky would still be glowing with the remnants of daylight. Clicking away, surfing the web, getting some inspiration for new graphic layouts, new website ideas, slowly drifting away into this altogether non-tangible yet always present virtual world.
My life would slow down as the world sped up around me. Outside the white and red headlights from passing cars would blur together into streaks of light. Inside the busy hustle and bustle would meld together into a ghostly image of people coming and going, eating and drinking, talking, laughing, waiting, watching...living.
But for now, it's back to reality. Trying to figure out whats more real, the virtual escape brought on by a virtual community connected randomly throughout the world, or this drab corner desk, in this suburban office tower, surrounded by people willing to walk all over one another in order to make their payment on their brand new E-Class Sedan.
Ohh Blogging....how I love thee.
Saturday, September 8, 2007
My new website/portfolio
The basic framework is up, nothing to scream about, but it's potential is huge. I've started messing around with SEO (Search Engine Optimization). A big industry term people throw around to sound smart. In essence I'm trying to manipulate Google and Yahoo, etc. into indexing my site above anyone else with the same info on their site...trouble is I'm in San Diego home to ohhh...10,000+ graphic designing photographers who dabble in web design. But hey, if you search...davidhgatley I'm number one!....of one ;) But, there is hope. I've started to understand how Google crawls the web and ranks sites. If you're interested in such things there is an incredibly informative site at www.kingsleygraphics.net.
They really pointed me in the right direction and offered incredible steps in Lehman's terms.
I suppose this project (davidhgatley.com) is really more of a creative outlet than it is a portfolio. But shhhh.... no telling;) There are so many incredible tools and information available out there. And well, using free software to build a site map for google, gsitecrawler.com then installing free code from StatCounter to check the site traffic coming in and out of all my sites, not to mention all the other free tools at my disposal got me to thinking; I should try and return the favor. I should try to share whatever knowledge I have (assuming its worth sharing) and make it available to anyone who cares to read it...
Hence...here we are.
Right Now I've had about 3 people visit my site, My girlfriend and my Mom ;) But as of 10:30am this morning it was officially made public and indexed in Google's directory...so I'm expecting at least 12,034 hits by tonight... ok maybe not, but I'm interested to see how traffic flows in and out of websites; where the most random site traffic can be found, and if all of this actually generates anything tangible (i.e. dollar bills in my wallet) in the near future. I'm going to stay away from website advertising, at least for now anyways. I can't stand annoying, distracting, flashey adds that make information hard to display, and read. I also think advertising on Blogs ruins any chance of credibility or trust the author can have. But that's beyond the point, I need readers before I can get rich from their mouse clicks =)
Here's to a productive use of the past week and a half of my life =)
-David
Friday, September 7, 2007
The Freedom of the Internet
If you are not yet familiar with the term "Net-Neutrality" this is nothing new; bloggers, active citizens, websites, and activists have been trying to bring attention to the topic for years. According to www.savetheinternet.com "When we log onto the Internet, we take lots of things for granted. We assume that we'll be able to access whatever website we want, whenever we want to go there. We assume that we can use any feature we like; watching videos online, listening to podcasts, searching for information, emailing, and instant messaging, anytime we choose. We also assume that we can attach devices like wireless routers, game controllers, or extra hard drives to make our online experience better.
What makes all these assumptions possible is "Network Neutrality," the guiding principle that ensures the Internet remains free and unrestricted. Net Neutrality prevents the companies that control the wires bringing you the Internet from discriminating against content based on its ownership or source. But that could all change.
The biggest cable and telephone companies would like to charge money for smooth access to Web sites, speed to run applications, and permission to plug in external devices. These network conglomerates believe they should be able to charge website operators, application providers, and device manufacturers for the right to use the network. Those who don't make a deal and pay up will experience discrimination: Their sites won't load as quickly, their applications and devices won't work as well. Without legal protection, consumers could find that a network operator has blocked the website of a competitor, or slowed it down so much that it's unusable.
The network owners say they want a "tiered" Internet. If you pay to get in the top tier, your site and your service will run fast. If you don't, you'll be in the slow lane."
What does all this mean? Well, say for instance you hate Myspace and prefer Facebook. If you are a Cox Cable subscriber and Facebook doesn't pay Cox money to host the site, you won't be able to access the site from your home computer. Or perhaps Fox News (The News Corp.) and Time-Warner have a partnership, if you have internet access from Time-Warner (Roadrunner) you won't be able to go to ABC, The New York Times, or NBC for news. Basically your Internet will become limited, and you will be restricted access to the sites you want to go to.
"The nation's largest telephone and cable companies, including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner, want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which websites go fast or slow and which won't load at all.
They want to tax content providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their data. They want to discriminate in favor of their own search engines, Internet phone services, and streaming video, while slowing down or blocking their competitors.
These companies have a new vision for the Internet. Instead of an even playing field, they want to reserve express lanes for their own content and services, or those from big corporations that can afford the steep tolls, and leave the rest of us on a winding dirt road. Congress is now considering a major overhaul of the Telecommunications Act. The telephone and cable companies are filling up congressional campaign coffers and hiring high-priced lobbyists. They've set up "Astroturf" groups like "Hands Off the Internet" to confuse the issue and give the appearance of grassroots support.
On June 8, the House of Representatives passed the "Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006," or COPE Act (H.R. 5252) -- a bill that offers no meaningful protections for Net Neutrality. An amendment offered by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), which would have instituted real Net Neutrality requirements, was defeated by intense industry lobbying.
It now falls to the Senate to save the free and open Internet. Fortunately, Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) have introduced a bipartisan measure, the "Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2006" (S. 2917), that would provide meaningful protection for Net Neutrality.
On June 28, the Snowe-Dorgan bill was introduced as an amendment to Sen. Ted Stevens' (R-Alaska) major rewrite of the Telecom Act (S.2686) [now HR.5252]. The committee split down the middle on the measure, casting a tie vote of 11-11.
Though meaningful Net Neutrality protections were not added to Stevens' bill, the fight for Internet freedom is gaining serious momentum as the bill moves toward the full Senate later this year. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has threatened to place a "hold" on the entire legislation unless it reinstates Net Neutrality and prevents discrimination on the Internet.
What can you do? Like any other important issue, you can write your congressman, and hope they read it, you can go to hundreds of informational sites such as www.savetheinternet.com and sign Internet petitions and hope that your name does something. Or perhaps more realistic, you can talk about it. Ask your friends if they have heard about it. Bring up net-neutrality in random discussions, be a net nerd. We are a generation defined by electronic, available, and most importantly, free media.
-David
How to take better photos
First off, before I go any further. If you read nothing more than this paragraph, remember this one thing, take more pictures. Wether you're shooting a group shot of 5 of your best friends, or a beautiful sunset, always take at least 2-3 more photos than you think you should. Granted popping the flash inside some restaurant 6 times will inevitably make the entire place hate you, and blind your friends....but... well you get the point, its better to take 10 shots and get one good one, than to take 3 shots and have nothing worth keeping. So many great photos can be ruined by the smallest changes in light, the blink of an eye, etc...SO TAKE MORE PHOTOS than you think you should.
Alright, that being said, here are a few simple steps that will change the way you compose your photos, improve your existing pictures and impress your friends.
When you look at a photo you, for the most part, like it or hate it instantly. You may not even realize how much you dislike a photo at first glance, but try this; look through your own gallery right now (or after you're done reading this) =), and take note of the photos you have to squint at to see better, or the ones you just breeze through without a second glance, and focus on the ones that just seem pleasing for no apparent reason. There are a lot of reasons why you don't really like the image, and if you have the time, and understand why, you can generally fix each one of them or prevent repeating that photo in the future.
Compositional factors are at work in every image on a subconscious level, the most powerful is the rule of thirds.
The Rule of Thirds
If you split every image into three sections (top to bottom or side to side) you'll start to find that the photos that are most pleasing to the eye have excluded the subject from the middle third and moved it to the outer thirds: see below: ( this rule doesn't always apply, centering your subjects can still be powerful and moving, but for the most part you want to avoid centering)
Notice that the tree is the main subject and it's located in the right 3rd portion of the photo.
Where as a centered subject isn't as aesthetically pleasing:
Most people don't realize the brain interprets negative space and positive space when looking at a photo. Balance and weight are added to subjects as your eye moves from point to point on the photo. Your brain typically interprets this data in distinct patterns. Photos that go against the natural flow of eye movement break that pattern and are less pleasing to the eye.
The Diagonal Rule
Following the principle behind the rule of thirds, comes the diagonal rule. And like it sounds it has to do with the natural diagonal lines found in a photo. When you look at a photo your eyes naturally want to be guided towards the center of the image. Diagonal lines in the photo will direct your attention in that order, if there aren't any, it becomes distracting to the brain and less aesthetically pleasing. For example:
Notice how the natural lines in these photos grab your attention and constantly pull your eyes back to the center of the photo.
I often find this to be more difficult to be conscious of while taking a photo. I generally have to edit photos after the fact to follow the rule of diagonals, but keeping it in mind while composing the photo will definitely improve your shots.
EYE LEVEL and CAMERA ANGLE
Probably the most common problem in boring/unflattering photos is the angle at which the picture is taken and the position of the subjects eyes in the photo. The worst and most unflattering way to take a picture of someone if from a low point of view (kneeling with a camera taking a picture of a person standing up). Unless double chins are your thing, you generally want to raise the camera a little taller than feels normal, and position the eye level of the subject in the top third of the photo. Following the rule of thirds.
For example:
In this photo the eye level is such that it positions the subject in most of the frame. Something you want to stay away from would be this for example:
The average eye level is towards the middle of the photo, leaving too much open space above the group of guys. Had the picture been angled down slightly, exposing more of the body and using less of the empty dark space above, the photo would be nice to look at. This is that same photo cropped:
Notice here that while the same amount of the guys bodies are in the picture, they fill more of the frame. The eye level has been moved to the upper third portion of the frame, and its more pleasing to the eye. That is of course if you find a photo of 7 drunk guys pleasing to the eye, I think its difficult to look at the photo either way, but it illustrates my point nicely =)
(It's also a good practice to take pictures of subjects (not people) from an unnatural perspective. Don't just stand straight up, bring the camera to your eye level and shoot something. Get close to your subject, put the camera on the ground, or directly above your subject and take a picture of it in a way you normally wouldn't view it.)
There are a lot of editing techniques you can use to correct most compositional problems with photos, but in doing so you lose a lot of the original image. I will go over some basic photo editing techniques in another blog soon.
Hope this helps,
-David